A Pragmatic Approach

British europhiles don’t think very highly of the EU, do they?

Liberal Democrat MEP, Catherine Bearder, recently said to a House of Lords select committee: “My concern is that if we vote to leave that the deal we’d be given would be such that no one else would want to leave. We would bear the brunt of the angry other 27 EU countries”.

If this is not just baseless fear-mongering (bad enough) and Ms Bearder is serious about what she says, then one has to ask an even more serious question: Why would an elected representative support such a capricious, anti-democratic organisation? The thought that the EU would respond to an expression of sovereign will with “angry” reprisals casts the EU in an extraordinarily bad light—and would be reason enough for Britain to disengage from such a grouping.

This pragmatic analysis from LeaveHQ sets the record straight.

Ms Bearder and her europhile associates may be that petty and small-minded but the EU is a rules-based organisation that is bound by treaty and convention to negotiate in good faith with international partners. There should be no great difficulty agreeing a mutually acceptable Brexit deal—though the discussions will be complex and highly technical—provided that both sides are willing to compromise.

Compromise for the EU would assure Britain’s trouble-free exit from political union, without adding to the ongoing crises in the eurozone or compounding the migrant crisis—both created and facilitated by EU policy. Compromise for Britain would assure trouble-free access to and participation in the Single Market as part of a phased withdrawal that recovers national independence and policy control in stages.

From a political perspective it is as simple as that. A short-term compromise on the issue of freedom of movement as part of an interim solution and British civil servants and their colleagues in the Berlaymont spend the two-year negotiating period—specified under the terms of Article 50 of the TEU—picking over the kinds of arcana that need not preclude debate about the future direction of the country.

Making it clear that Brexiteers envision a phased approach to EU withdrawal—and communicating that message to the wider British public—also has the happy consequence of changing the focus of the referendum debate to the question of: Who governs Britain? Which is, after all, what we are really debating when we discuss the matter of Britain’s EU membership.

Advertisements

One thought on “A Pragmatic Approach

  1. Brilliant – you make a really important point here. Why to British europhiles love an organisation that they consistently warn us stands ready to club us over the head and inflict “punishment beatings” on us if we step out of line, or calmly and rationally part ways with them based on an honest different vision of the future?

    Funny how quick the high-minded internationalism of the europhile turns to snarling threats of revenge and coercion when they don’t get their way…

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s